News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules. Parent comment

Re:Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules by tines on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @06:30PM (#22551512)
Isn't U-235 an element?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules by NikolaeVarius on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @06:32PM (#22551539)
It's an isotope of Uranium. It's restricted but I'm pretty sure its not illegal to own a small amount of it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules by cwkoss on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @06:56PM (#22551695)
Not illegal to own uranium ore - I think the restrictions are only on the refined product
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules by eganist on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @07:09PM (#22551794)
If we're being pedantic, pure uranium is literally perfectly refined uranium ore. Possession of weaponizable isotopes of pure elemental uranium is absolutely regulated.

Pretty sure the same is true for some of the other particularly WMD-able elements, but I'm not about to google them.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules by anfilt on Thursday March 12, 2020 @05:15AM (#22555042)
Don't you find the idea sad that you would have self censor what you would read on the internet to not become of interest or concern to your government.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules by ThePowerOfFuet on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @07:52PM (#22552069)
www.duckduckgo.com
[ Parent | on HN ]