Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by swader999 on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:35PM
(#22550190)
I imagine that was done on some doors not all, just to better funnel people to the remaining open exits where they had their manned check points.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by samsolomon on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:54PM
(#22550437)
I cannot see that happening in the U.S. without armed confrontations.
Like guns or not, that's the 2nd Amendment at work.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by Eric_WVGG on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @05:59PM
(#22551251)
Is it? Unless you have some sort of evidence that “they didn’t try this because guns,” that’s less than speculation.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by samsolomon on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @06:46PM
(#22551635)
That is ridiculous. I was commenting on a hypothetical situation.
People own guns for defense. There's reason to believe that if people are being trapped in a building against their will, they may use them.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by earthtourist on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:38PM
(#22550232)
Rather scary how massive apartment buildings in China, where most people live, are able to be turned into prisons so quickly.
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/08/china-...