Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by sulam on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:16PM
(#22549997)
China is now seeing a wave of secondary infections as they relax travel restrictions and as people enter the country from elsewhere. They have not stopped the spread, they simply slowed it down.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by Spooky23 on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:30PM
(#22550137)
That's the whole point. If you slow it down you can avoid the rapid spike in severe cases that overwhelm the system. It's like traffic -- once you surpass a certain volume, the system locks up and throughput drops.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by CydeWeys on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:25PM
(#22550096)
And that in itself is a huge accomplishment that will save many lives.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by ummonk on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @09:24PM
(#22552571)
I think the point was to do a controlled restart while making sure the rate of secondary infections remains low enough that the impact of the coronavirus remains less than the flu.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ...
by jessriedel on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:33PM
(#22550172)
What is your source? I can't see anything visible in the Hopkins data, and all news stories seem to be about continued stability in China.