News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ... by sulam on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:16PM (#22549997)
China is now seeing a wave of secondary infections as they relax travel restrictions and as people enter the country from elsewhere. They have not stopped the spread, they simply slowed it down.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ... by Spooky23 on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:30PM (#22550137)
That's the whole point. If you slow it down you can avoid the rapid spike in severe cases that overwhelm the system. It's like traffic -- once you surpass a certain volume, the system locks up and throughput drops.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ... by CydeWeys on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:25PM (#22550096)
And that in itself is a huge accomplishment that will save many lives.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ... by ummonk on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @09:24PM (#22552571)
I think the point was to do a controlled restart while making sure the rate of secondary infections remains low enough that the impact of the coronavirus remains less than the flu.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ... by jessriedel on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @04:33PM (#22550172)
What is your source? I can't see anything visible in the Hopkins data, and all news stories seem to be about continued stability in China.
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ... by wholien on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @05:20PM (#22550804)
source? China seems to have very low numbers of new infections right now
Re:San Francisco bans public events holding more than 1,000 ... by sulam on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @06:01PM (#22551271)
I work for a company with significant manufacturing in China, our source is people on the ground. So, Anecdata, but well-connected anecdata.