News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox 74 by StavrosK on Tuesday March 10, 2020 @09:17AM (#22535159)
Sure, but it's not as convenient as doing it automatically.
Re:Firefox 74 by dmit on Tuesday March 10, 2020 @10:25AM (#22535688)
If you specify a catch-all url to open in No Container, would that work?

  !*.google.com , Google
  !* , No Container
Re:Firefox 74 by StavrosK on Tuesday March 10, 2020 @10:30AM (#22535727)
Oh wow, that did work, thanks! It's odd, because the extension reordered the catch-all URL to the top, so I'm not sure how the specificity goes.
Re:Firefox 74 by wexxy on Tuesday March 10, 2020 @09:59AM (#22535476)
I feel like that's probably by design. If you were in a session and clicking links, the assumption is if you're in the container already, you'd want to remain in the container. I don't disagree it would be nice for you to be able to specify domains per containers, but yeah, maybe that'll come in the future..
Re:Firefox 74 by StavrosK on Tuesday March 10, 2020 @10:02AM (#22535500)
It's definitely by design, since the containers are meant to segregate accounts (e.g. a company container and a personal container), but a second mode would be useful since many people are using them for per-site isolation.