News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Memcached 1.6 by jasonwatkinspdx on Monday March 09, 2020 @04:04AM (#22523765)
You'll get a bunch of garbage answers here to be frank, from people who never put more than trivial load through both.

Memcache blows redis out of the water in terms of raw throughput and latency, like it's not even remotely close on modern lots of cores and big memory machines.

Redis has a more feature rich api, but has fundamentally hobbled itself on a root hash table and concurrency implementation that is circa 1990.

Give memcached a try, even if it means you implement some stuff you currently defer to redis ops. Measure it. Look at the code bases. Make up your own mind about performance and which actually makes your code simpler.

Re:Memcached 1.6 by haolez on Monday March 09, 2020 @08:42AM (#22524886)
Thanks. I'll make sure to create a PoC and post back here.
Re:Memcached 1.6 by dijit on Monday March 09, 2020 @07:16AM (#22524473)
http://antirez.com/news/94

TL;DR: Redis is just doing different things, and the slab allocator is pretty efficient in regards to performance but not memory usage.

Re:Memcached 1.6 by dormando on Monday March 09, 2020 @04:34PM (#22529462)
Fwiw this post comparison is pretty old. The memory usage should be the same or better these days (automatic slab rebalancing, LRU expired item crawler, chunked items, etc).