My earlier comment was about webpages, not projects, though I think having a project-specific UUID would have major advantages as you point out.
> Google specifically says that the page is missing cc8ece66-ded9-45f0-ad45-579bb97251bf, so I have no idea why it offers it.
Looks like Google is matching only "ded9". I recall that Google treats dashes as word separators and underscores not as word separators. This might make a UUID not a good choice because you only want to display exact matches.
My earlier comment was about webpages, not projects, though I think having a project-specific UUID would have major advantages as you point out.
> Google specifically says that the page is missing cc8ece66-ded9-45f0-ad45-579bb97251bf, so I have no idea why it offers it.
Looks like Google is matching only "ded9". I recall that Google treats dashes as word separators and underscores not as word separators. This might make a UUID not a good choice because you only want to display exact matches.
https://searchengineland.com/google-bing-handle-underscores-...