Re:Adjusted Age-Specific Case Fatality Ratio During for COVI...
by kd5bjo on Sunday March 08, 2020 @09:14AM
(#22517851)
That works out to 2000 micromorts, which compares to the accumulated baseline risk over 3 months of living: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micromort
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Adjusted Age-Specific Case Fatality Ratio During for COVI...
by yread on Sunday March 08, 2020 @09:35AM
(#22517930)
Yes, bit more dangerous than BASE-jumping. No, thanks. When was the last time you did something that had 0.2% chance to kill you?
Also what this number kind of glosses over is how are the survivors doing. Half of those that get ARDS have life-long consequences. There are still 20.000 active cases in China, 1 month after the epidemic peaked there.
EDIT: I took BASE jumping risk from here http://www.wingsuitfly.com/risk/4572000812 not from the wiki reference
Re:Adjusted Age-Specific Case Fatality Ratio During for COVI...
by IanCal on Sunday March 08, 2020 @10:23AM
(#22518145)
That's also the risk without some major reward. If you want to do base jumping you're trading that risk for an exhilarating experience at least.
Re:Adjusted Age-Specific Case Fatality Ratio During for COVI...
by hclalpha on Sunday March 08, 2020 @10:27AM
(#22518165)
Yeah but the report doesn't talk about the degradation in quality of life you'll have to endure if you survive. It may take you months/years to fully recover.
Re:Adjusted Age-Specific Case Fatality Ratio During for COVI...
by Symmetry on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:17PM
(#22518797)
As a 30-something 2000 micromorts is like my entire yearly micromort budget. I mean, I wasn't seriously worried about dying in 2020 but risks over 1,000 micromorts are worth treating as a serious deal even if you shouldn't be terrified of them.