Re:No, shut up. What statistical programming languages can l...
by chc on Tuesday February 22, 2011 @01:16PM
(#2250846)
I think his point here is that the most visible aspects of the code are the structures built up to do the computation, rather than the computation itself. As a description of a generator loop, it reads quite nicely. But the language does not give much ground to the topic it's describing, in the way (to use the obvious example) Lisp would. I think that's what he is getting at.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.