News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Turn down the quantum volume by core-questions on Friday March 06, 2020 @12:45PM (#22505594)
> Furthermore, real optimization problems have high connectivity, high weight cost function terms, and require higher precision than available.

Have you seen their hybrid system they just released? https://www.zdnet.com/article/this-cloud-service-lets-you-us...

Looks like it's a strong contender for people who have bigger, higher-connectivity problems that want to get ready for when the quantum processors are bigger.

Re:Turn down the quantum volume by s1dev on Friday March 06, 2020 @01:16PM (#22505854)
You can't get thousands of variables with all to all connectivity on a quantum annealer. The noise will kill it. I.e. you will never have such a device with reasonable coupler precision.

The techniques for decomposing a problem and solving the sub problems are a big (exponential) overhead because of frustration effects which require you to look at the entire problem at once.

And for context the PUBO -> QUBO mapping (high order to low order) + topology embedding can blow up the number of variables by an order of magnitude or more. The solution space scales exponentially with the number of variables so a naive solver will again deal with a messy overhead.