Re:Is Go Duck-Typed?
by kazinator on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @07:59PM
(#22489912)
If you have to declare any sort of is-a or is-a-like relationship to be a duck, then it's not duck typing. Reason being: without the declaration, you can quack all you want, but you are not substitutable for a duck. Duck typing means that the presence of suitable properties and behaviors alone determine substitutability, not the is-a relationship.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.