News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Go Duck-Typed? by loopz on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @04:32PM (#22488381)
"Drawable" as a name is pretty bland, like patterns. Do we ever really say "drawable" out loud?

So I suspect if we seek more meaningful objects and models, they become more active, have better names, improved design, etc.

If you ask a janitor about Drawable, will he say it's all about draw()? So I think it's kind of a dreary default that we need to avoid and focus on who the actors are, what messages they will pass, and the hidden treasures they encapsulate (don't show, but tell!).

There are no comments on this comment yet.