Re:No Ghost in the Machine
by AstralStorm on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @12:45PM
(#22485882)
And vitalism fails because alleged vital property is undefined or tautological.
The most fun offshoot is philosophers moving qualia (perception-associations) out of the realm of neuroscience just enough every time there's an advancement.
Re:No Ghost in the Machine
by mooseburger on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @12:57PM
(#22486001)
Any example of that?
A thinking vitalist would say that, even if a computer could do the thing you're talking about, it wouldn't be "conscious" because consciousness requires this aura that only living creatures possess.