News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The growth of command-line options, 1979-Present by bear8642 on Tuesday March 03, 2020 @06:58PM (#22479951)
>I just wonder if one day we'll be using systems with 4tb of ram that would be snappier if upgraded to 8tb or 16tb.

Can't find but feel there's a quote like "Programs will grow to fill memory"

Re:The growth of command-line options, 1979-Present by jokit on Tuesday March 03, 2020 @07:07PM (#22480013)
I know that some people are only as efficient as they're forced to be. I hope there are efforts to take what is needed, and make it more efficient. There are efforts like Commander X16 to make a new 8 bit computer, and others where people are rewriting things in Rust..

BTW, I have a first gen iPad sitting around that worked very the first two years or so of its existence, and it barely functions today. I know part of that is Apple "protecting" older batteries by slowing down older stuff so we go out and buy new things, but I would like to believe that we're capable or creating an OS for that hardware today that would run better than it did originally, rather than barely function at all.

Re:The growth of command-line options, 1979-Present by kqr on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @12:51AM (#22481504)
> Can't find but feel there's a quote like "Programs will grow to fill memory"

That is a ball we set in motion when we introduced virtual memory, particularly with overcommit.

Give a developer the option to write calls to malloc that never fail, and boy will they make use of that! Performance be damned.

Re:The growth of command-line options, 1979-Present by zeckalpha on Tuesday March 03, 2020 @09:13PM (#22480647)
Not necessarily on the desktop today, but yes. There are workloads like this out there.