News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by zepto on Tuesday March 03, 2020 @11:45AM (#22476120)
No problem.

These things can be true as well, and none of them imply that Apple intentionally slowed phones to boost sales.

Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by mthoms on Tuesday March 03, 2020 @02:17PM (#22477788)
I agree it's inconclusive as to whether the whole thing was to increase sales in the short term. But keeping it a secret from your own staff is highly suspect. Like I said, they had their own support staff regularly telling their best customers (some of whom paid extra for Applecare) that they were basically imagining things.

All allegedly because people are too dense to understand the concept that rechargeable batteries degrade over time? I learned this fact some 30 years ago as a child playing with toys.

So, maybe it wasn't to increase sales in the short term but it certainly was done to protect Apple's brand. Which, in turn increases the company value.

Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by zepto on Tuesday March 03, 2020 @07:46PM (#22480229)
This is true, but it’s also true that it wasn’t in a vacuum.

People were already trying to damage Apple’s brand by making the case that they were intentionally slowing phones down to force upgrades, long before there was any substance to the concept.

I’m not saying they made good choices, but it’s not clear that they had good options.