News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by hu3 on Monday March 02, 2020 @07:37PM (#22470685)
Pardon my language but...

It's in the fucking article!

> Apple attributed the problems mainly to temperature changes, high usage and other issues, and said its engineers worked quickly and successfully to address them. Analysts sometimes refer to the slowing of iPhones as "throttling."

Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by manfredo on Monday March 02, 2020 @07:42PM (#22470716)
Not only does your quote not say what was alleged (that Apple denied that battery usage was a factor in slowdown), it actually says that Apple placed high usage as one of the factors.
Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by hu3 on Monday March 02, 2020 @07:55PM (#22470796)
According to Apple the slowing of the phones were mainly due to:

* Temperature changes

* High usage

* Other issues

How are customers supposed to decipher that the problem is the battery from that statement? This is straight up denying the actual problem.

Not to mention that when I took my old 6s to the store to see what was the slowing down about they told me it was perfectly fine and was running at the same speed as new.

Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by manfredo on Monday March 02, 2020 @08:21PM (#22470959)
How is it "straight up denying the actual problem" when high usage is listed as one of the points? You use your phone a lot, the battery life degrades, and your CPU is throttled because the battery cannot produce sufficient charge to run it at the highest clock rate.

I don't deny your individual experiences at the Apple store, but the claim that Apple denied that battery life can cause phones to slow down remains unsubstantiated.

Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by hu3 on Monday March 02, 2020 @08:27PM (#22470988)
> you should read the actual article Apple wrote rather than Tech Crunch's summarization. It is not an apology. It's explaining battery chemistry: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208387

I'll do one better, I'll dig Apple post before they changed to a non-apology one:

https://web.archive.org/web/20171229000007/https://www.apple...

First paragraph:

> We’ve been hearing feedback from our customers about the way we handle performance for iPhones with older batteries and how we have communicated that process. We know that some of you feel Apple has let you down. We apologize.

Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by manfredo on Monday March 02, 2020 @08:30PM (#22471005)
Show me where Apple said "battery life does not cause your phone to slow down". This is what was alleged - that Apple denied battery life causes phones to slow down.

Apple wrote this letter to appease customers, because they don't understand battery chemistry and the canard that Apple was slowing down phones was proliferating and they needed to make some gesture.

> We’ve been hearing feedback from our customers about the way we handle performance for iPhones with older batteries and how we have communicated that process. We know that some of you feel Apple has let you down.

This is a far cry from what was initially alleged: that Apple denied that battery life caused phones to slow down. This "apology" essentially amounts to "we're sorry you don't understand battery chemistry".

Re:Apple to pay up to $500M to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow... by hu3 on Monday March 02, 2020 @08:32PM (#22471020)
They couldn't deny it anymore. That's why it's an apology.