News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows93 by sn_master on Monday March 02, 2020 @11:19AM (#22465713)
"nothing ever animated like this"

Active Desktop...

I had one of those were almost every single icon on the desktop was animated, even "My Computer".

Re:Windows93 by laumars on Monday March 02, 2020 @12:00PM (#22466210)
Active Desktop was just a HTML desktop (it didn't animate the window forms) and it part of Internet Explorer 4 so quiet late into the life of Windows 95. Probably around 1997 if I had to guess. There certainly wasn't anything like that on Windows 3.x which is what people would have been using in 1993.
Re:Windows93 by asveikau on Monday March 02, 2020 @11:59AM (#22466194)
It did not make win32 windows animate when they opened or closed.

Edit: multiple people mentioned windowblinds. I used it too in the late 90s. My point stands.

Re:Windows93 by nitrogen on Monday March 02, 2020 @12:09PM (#22466311)
There were third party addons that did some pretty crazy things. I don't know if animations were among them, but I do remember at least one that would completely retheme windows with different shapes and layouts, Windowblinds I think it was called.
Re:Windows93 by qplex on Monday March 02, 2020 @12:48PM (#22466762)
Thanks for refreshing my memory. Those were pretty cool programs back then.

I definetly remember Windowsblinds too (and geez, it seems they're still around ...).

I was into LiteStep, which basically was a shell replacement for explorer.exe.

I'm also reminded how trivially easy it was to configure Win9x to use a different shell: you'd just edit system.ini under [boot] to say shell=litestep.exe and you were done.

Here are some screenshots:

[0] https://www.stardock.com/products/windowblinds/wb-aug00g.jpg

[1] http://litestep.net/snapshot1.png

Re:Windows93 by Izkata on Monday March 02, 2020 @01:44PM (#22467380)
> I'm also reminded how trivially easy it was to configure Win9x to use a different shell: you'd just edit system.ini under [boot] to say shell=litestep.exe and you were done.

Fun fact, Win98 still had progman.exe installed (from win 3.1 and earlier). I had to switch to it in system.ini one day when something in explorer got corrupted and the normal UI wouldn't load.

Re:Windows93 by Joeri on Monday March 02, 2020 @02:03PM (#22467607)
You could do that trick even in windows 3.11. I remember using central point desktop for a while: 3d look, virtual desktops, advanced file manager and a bunch of other goodies in the 3.x era.

http://toastytech.com/guis/cpdesk.html

It was bloated and unstable though, so I was glad to upgrade to windows 95.

Re:Windows93 by core-questions on Monday March 02, 2020 @03:19PM (#22468465)
Litestep was fun, especially for those of us that couldn't get away with installing Linux on the family computer.

I also used eFX, which was a free Windowblinds competitor that made it super easy to make skins, and released a ton of garish and ugly ones back in the day.

Re:Windows93 by Rhinobird on Monday March 02, 2020 @02:02PM (#22467603)
Holy shit, Litestep! That takes me back.
Re:Windows93 by sn_master on Monday March 02, 2020 @12:31PM (#22466551)
yup! I used it until Windows XP, before Vista made it kind of pointless.
Re:Windows93 by sn_master on Monday March 02, 2020 @12:29PM (#22466528)
Window Blinds did that and way more on Windows 98 and it was fairly popular.

Many free other apps existed that did similar things too.

Re:Windows93 by Techies4Trump on Monday March 02, 2020 @02:09PM (#22467673)
Active Desktop was the first thing I disabled whenever I installed Win98 on a new machine.