Assuming that his fans on the other side of political spectrum somehow don't understand the message is very naive – you don't have to agree with the author, or even interpret the work in the same way to enjoy it. After the work is finished, author's intent – who was supposed to be the villain, what was supposed to be the moral of the story – matters not.

And, well, his thoughts about theoretical "UN with teeth" is such a textbook example of Utopiah fallacy, I'm amazed he's actually saying something like this with a straight face.