News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX Starship SN1 experiences an anomaly and explodes by 101404 on Saturday February 29, 2020 @06:24AM (#22450084)
> We weren’t expecting to see SN-1 fly, and yet it did onto SN-2!

That's not good. Is SN2 fine?

Re:SpaceX Starship SN1 experiences an anomaly and explodes by StarDucks on Saturday February 29, 2020 @07:18AM (#22450213)
It's bad wording. Pretty sure they mean that now SN-1 is destroyed it's time to move on to SN-2.
Re:SpaceX Starship SN1 experiences an anomaly and explodes by 101404 on Saturday February 29, 2020 @03:46PM (#22452978)
Re-reading the Tweet I just noticed, he didn't mean "onto SN2", he meant "on to SN2".

Sometimes spaces can change the meaning, I guess.