Re:CDC declined to test new coronavirus patient for days, Ca...
by nomel on Thursday February 27, 2020 @03:44PM
(#22437614)
> They're worried about false negatives,
Could you explain this logic a little more? Unless the false negative is something very high (do we know what it is?), I don't understand why identifying none is better than identifying some some, especially with an exponential spread.
Could you explain this logic a little more? Unless the false negative is something very high (do we know what it is?), I don't understand why identifying none is better than identifying some some, especially with an exponential spread.