News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CDC declined to test new coronavirus patient for days, Ca... by drongoking on Thursday February 27, 2020 @03:23PM (#22437388)
As opposed to corporate bureaucracies? If you think the free market magically makes everything efficient and free of politics and bureaucracy, try spending some time in a big company.

Remember this folks when voting for people who advocate for privatizing or de-regulating industries.

Re:CDC declined to test new coronavirus patient for days, Ca... by AnthonyMouse on Thursday February 27, 2020 @03:51PM (#22437696)
> As opposed to corporate bureaucracies?

Corporate bureaucracies can absolutely be just as terrible. But the problem isn't that a bureaucracy exists, it's that there is a law requiring the approval of a specific bureaucracy.

If a corporate bureaucracy is slow and inefficient, that sucks, but it creates an opportunity for somebody else to be less slow and less inefficient. If a government bureaucracy is slow and inefficient, can you start your own and go into competition with them?

Re:CDC declined to test new coronavirus patient for days, Ca... by whatshisface on Thursday February 27, 2020 @03:33PM (#22437471)
Employee counts:

- Google: 100,000

- Procter and Gamble: 100,000

- GlaxoSmithKline: 100,000

(Weird how the figures for the first three random companies I looked up are so close...)

- Health and Human Services: 80,000

- Uber: 20,000

- FDA: 15,000

- Sanofi Pasteur (working on coronavirus vaccine): 15,000

- CDC: 10,000

Re:CDC declined to test new coronavirus patient for days, Ca... by 3fe9a03ccd14ca5 on Thursday February 27, 2020 @04:11PM (#22437934)
You think corporate bureaucracies are bad now? What until they’re a legally protected monopoly.