News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple wont let bad guys use iPhones in movies, director says by barrkel on Thursday February 27, 2020 @01:39PM (#22436271)
https://rodriqueslaw.com/blog/how-use-brands-and-products-fi...

Trademark owners may object to the use of their trademarks in fictional films or other media productions without their consent, and seek to enjoin such uses by filing a trademark infringement action under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)), unfair competition in violation of the common law of New York, under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act ("FTDA"), and dilution of trademark in violation of New York's anti-dilution statute (section 368-d of the New York General Business Law).

Re:Apple wont let bad guys use iPhones in movies, director says by gamblor956 on Thursday February 27, 2020 @02:42PM (#22436982)
Somehow you picked entirely the wrong paragraph from that blog post to summarize it.

The cited paragraph would be true of a movie like Harold and Kumar go to White Castle because the brand name is part of the title of the movie and the brand plays a major part of the story.

But it wouldn't apply to an incidental use of a branded product in a production, i.e., a car chase scene whether the brand of the car or vehicle-specific features are irrelevant.

Re:Apple wont let bad guys use iPhones in movies, director says by barrkel on Thursday February 27, 2020 @08:26PM (#22439773)
Of course it wouldn't apply to incidental background usage. What did you think I was saying? Somehow you got the completely wrong idea.