Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by deugtniet on Thursday February 27, 2020 @07:56AM
(#22432777)
If you make things more expensive, less people will buy that thing. It will reduce emissions in the UK by reducing the airtraffic through the UK. Exactly the intended consequence.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by smashah on Thursday February 27, 2020 @08:09AM
(#22432875)
Yeah no. LHR has one of the highest airport tax, yet still is a leading world hub and annual pax numbers keep going up.
Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by toyg on Thursday February 27, 2020 @08:25AM
(#22433004)
That simply means, from a “prohibitionist” point of view, that the tax is not high enough.
Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by smashah on Thursday February 27, 2020 @10:37AM
(#22434164)
Lol can't wait for 400% beef tax to save the planet /s
Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by dackroyd99 on Thursday February 27, 2020 @07:57AM
(#22432792)
plus we can invest that money improving bus services and rail networks, which will help poorer people participate in the economy. If you can't get the bus to work, you probably don't need a plane to Dubai...
Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by smashah on Thursday February 27, 2020 @08:10AM
(#22432890)
What do you mean by improving bus services? Greater West London is the most connected outside of Central, it's TfL policy not to invest in better, cleaner, greener buses not because the money is instead going to LHR expansion.
Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by dackroyd99 on Thursday February 27, 2020 @03:46PM
(#22437639)
buses outside of London are (mainly) massively overpriced and horrifically irregular - it's a problem we need to fix right now imo
Re:Heathrow third runway plans ruled illegal: not consistent...
by smashah on Thursday February 27, 2020 @06:18PM
(#22439018)
I agree.
Personally I'm pro expansion but not too concerned if it never happens. However, it will be a great shame if, after all of this effort in the name of environment, these smaller issues I mentioned don't get solved.