News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Assange Hearing Day 2 by FireBeyond on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @07:38PM (#22429168)
> Also, he made himself available for questioning in a place where he would not be in danger of persecution by US and/or UK authorities - which is quite fair.

Is there some inherent human right against persecution? Which to be clear in this situation means "being accused of and investigated for additional crimes".

Is it "fair" for me to avoid questioning (or consequences of questioning) about crimes of which I'm accused, too?

Re:Assange Hearing Day 2 by einpoklum on Thursday February 27, 2020 @06:50AM (#22432470)
> Is there some inherent human right against persecution?

"Human rights" are a social construct, there's nothing inherent about them. Regardless - Assange was under no obligation towards Sweden given the circumstances.

> Is it "fair" for me to avoid questioning (or consequences of questioning) about crimes of which I'm accused, too?

1. Assange was not charged with any crimes.

2. Assange did not avoid questioning - neither in Sweden nor in Ecuador (= Ecuadorian Embassy). He only avoided exposing himself to US-instigated persecution.

Re:Assange Hearing Day 2 by FireBeyond on Thursday February 27, 2020 @07:16PM (#22439416)
Accused. In intimate crimes, where the only witnesses are the accuser and accused, it is typically extremely rare to charge the accused absent any interview whatsoever, so the "he wasn't charged" doesn't change my point.