News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hard Startups by SolarNet on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @05:48PM (#22428305)
> I actually just mean DARPA

NASA is the obvious next example. They pay for a lot of esoteric stuff that once made they don't actually end up needing - but having paid the startup costs - end up contributing to other fields.

I think FEMA also does similar things though at a much less parallel (but a higher volume).

Most of the "regulate and promote an industry" (a dumb idea for structuring them but I digress) agencies also do this. The NRC for example does a lot of research on storing and recycling nuclear waste, but also on new nuclear technologies.

And other military agencies aren't worth leaving out. The army core of engineers pushes a lot of contractors to deliver unique solutions that end up getting resold, see the concrete barriers in Iraq.

Re:Hard Startups by killjoywashere on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @05:58PM (#22428385)
IARPA, DTRA, SCO, DIU. The DoD spends like 50B a year in research and development.

NIH and CDMRP grant programs is several additional billion.

Re:Hard Startups by mattkrause on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @09:45PM (#22429899)
NIH is about 40 billion, and does a lot less development.
Re:Hard Startups by rossdavidh on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @11:19PM (#22430409)
NASA had, at one time, a "cheaper, smaller, faster" strategy, which they then abandoned the first time it resulted in a mission failure. If they had the 90% failure rate of many VC's, betting on lots of 100x but only 10% of the time startups, they would have been shut down.