News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China bans consumption and trade of wild animals by vraivroo on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @09:25AM (#22413435)
It would be historically correct, though.
Re:China bans consumption and trade of wild animals by bad_user on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @09:30AM (#22413482)
What do you mean by "historically correct"?

You mean blaming sugar or meat when historically people started eating too much, in the 20th century, due to food availability?

Re:China bans consumption and trade of wild animals by vezycash on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @10:04AM (#22413712)
Everything has become more abundant recently - clean water, vegetable, meat, fat, sugar, even clean water.

And less hunger too. I remember yawning repeatedly / feeling faint when I was younger but didn't know what I hungry until my mum pointed it out.

So you can't point to one or two food groups and claim their current abundance cause obesity.

Well, except white sugar lol.

Re:China bans consumption and trade of wild animals by 8note on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @01:07PM (#22415509)
id instead point to high fructose corn syrup. even more sugary than white sugar, and it's in basically all junk food instead of white sugar
Re:China bans consumption and trade of wild animals by bad_user on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @03:54PM (#22417330)
Show us a reliable study comparing table sugar with HCFS that can confirm what you're saying.

You won't find any.