Re:Where Sci-Hub Is
by unityByFreedom on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @02:39AM
(#22411505)
> Information is infinite
Published material is not infinite, nor is an author's time.
Information is infinite if you definite it to mean all information, but that is not the context here. The context here is published work.
Man, you are obnoxious. Do you understand that we authors of these damn papers get fuckall from their publication? The publication industry is an extortion racket.
Re:Where Sci-Hub Is
by unityByFreedom on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @09:03AM
(#22413234)
I said above I understand the hatred for academic journals. This thread is about whether all knowledge by otherwise uncompensated creators should be available for free.
Re:Where Sci-Hub Is
by matheusmoreira on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @04:36AM
(#22411917)
> Published material is not infinite
Sci-Hub proves otherwise.
> nor is an author's time.
True.
Food is finite. When you buy material goods, you subtract from the seller's supply of goods and add to your own. It's impossible to create new goods out of nothing. Since there isn't enough for everyone, an economy naturally arises.
Information is infinite. Copying and transmitting data is not only trivial, it is natural. That's why people came up with ways to create artificial scarcity. The only cost associated with human knowledge and art is that of creating it. After it's created, information costs $0.
All data, all files on a computer, they're essentially just really big numbers that humanity happened to discover. Once the number is known, modern computers make it possible to copy and transmit it for almost $0. Paywalls? Only one person needs to pay in order to get copy and distribute it to everyone else.
Nobody is saying creators shouldn't be compensated. We're saying they need a new business model. It's the 21st century. You no longer need huge printing presses in order to make copies of something at scale. It's as easy as copy paste.