Re:What people in tech had to say about JavaScript when it d...
by thedance on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @12:15AM
(#22411081)
What did you need plugins for? Netscape and MSIE both were able to add a script tag to the DOM dynamically, and that was all you needed to build the rest of it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What people in tech had to say about JavaScript when it d...
by steego on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @10:47AM
(#22414061)
You were able to use document.write somewhat dynamically, but the not reliably across all the browsers. Even if you did make an RPC call, there wasn't a lot you could do with it presentation wise because DHTML was two years away. (Even then, IE was the only one who had a decent implementation for a number of years after that.)
Plugins and applets filled a huge gap functionality wise.
Re:What people in tech had to say about JavaScript when it d...
by thedance on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @01:07PM
(#22415511)
You must have been before me. NN and MSIE 4 both had what we now call DOM Level 1, in 1997.
Re:What people in tech had to say about JavaScript when it d...
by steego on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @10:18PM
(#22419978)
My recollection at the time was IE4 had a working DOM while Netscape's DOM was buggy and left a lot to be desired. It was there, but it was a struggle.
I don't say that to crap on Netscape. Microsoft was a well-funded company with a lot of experts who had years of experience create applications with DOMs. Also, they had the luxury of delivering a browser for one operation system.
Netscape was a brand new company that went public 7 months after it's first release and 1.5 years after its founding. They sold investors the premise they were going to become the Microsoft of the internet. They had a fraction of the resources while they were trying to creating browsers, email clients, collaboration software, web server, and a host of other software for multiple platforms.