Re:Andreessen-Horowitz craps on “AI” startups from a great h...
by fxtentacle on Monday February 24, 2020 @05:44PM
(#22409252)
The algorithms that run on cell phones tend to be specially optimized and quality-reduced neural networks. For example, https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861
Re:Andreessen-Horowitz craps on “AI” startups from a great h...
by jiofih on Monday February 24, 2020 @06:05PM
(#22409395)
Apple does a pretty good job at that, with no compromise in quality.
Re:Andreessen-Horowitz craps on “AI” startups from a great h...
by fxtentacle on Monday February 24, 2020 @06:16PM
(#22409452)
I believe that just due to memory constraints, running any high-quality neural network on phones is currently impossible.
State of the art optical flow tracking needs about 10 GB of GPU memory to execute on full HD frames. I wouldn't know of any mainstream phone with that much RAM.
That, BTW, is also the reason why autonomous drones usually downsample the images before AI tracking, which has the nasty side effect of making thin branches, fences, telephone wires, etc. invisible.
For the vast majority of people the main expense is creating the combination of a dataset and model that works for their practical problem, with the dataset being the harder (and sometimes more expensive) problem of the two.
The dataset is also their "moat", even though most of them don't realize it, and don't put enough care into that part of the pipeline.