This really downplays the report or shows a complete lack of understanding.
Getting access to someone's Paypal account which could potentially mean all their credit cards and banks is definitely an issue that needs to be addressed. This in itself should not be reason to lose PCI certification.
However, as the article further indicates [1], failure to respond (or even closing the issue without resolving) is a completely different story.
[1] https://cybernews.com/security/we-found-6-critical-paypal-vu...
Getting access in this way to users' financial accounts is absolutely a vulnerability.
Ok, first, and foremost, don't you think it's a problem if there are stolen accounts? Wouldn't it make sense to visit the .onion site that the author refers to in the article and lock access to all accounts found there?
> Risk-based anti-ATO systems are heuristic.
This is Paypal practicing DID, which is great. What's not great is that the 2FA defense system could be defeated.
> Every bounty program I've ever paid attention to would close that report.
Getting access to a user's financial account and being able to move their money is something I would take serious 100/100 times. I hope you're not paying attention to bounty programs in the financial sector.