Re:OCaml 4.10
by pdimitar on Sunday February 23, 2020 @11:02PM
(#22401540)
It actually does. Thank you!
As I mentioned in a sibling comment, last time I seriously attempted getting more into OCaml has been at least half a year ago. I either didn't find some of those materials or they have been improved in the meantime.
Whatever the case, I can see clearly now that I was wrong about the poor quality of the dune and opam teaching material.
I apologise for that. And I'll be making a comeback to OCaml. I mean, it still has roadblocks but they are easier to overcome when tooling is handled (minus the lack of the multicore support but fingers crossed that that's coming soon).
As I mentioned in a sibling comment, last time I seriously attempted getting more into OCaml has been at least half a year ago. I either didn't find some of those materials or they have been improved in the meantime.
Whatever the case, I can see clearly now that I was wrong about the poor quality of the dune and opam teaching material.
I apologise for that. And I'll be making a comeback to OCaml. I mean, it still has roadblocks but they are easier to overcome when tooling is handled (minus the lack of the multicore support but fingers crossed that that's coming soon).