News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:70% of Americans Support Solar Mandate on New Homes by danaris on Sunday February 23, 2020 @04:21PM (#22399616)
The idea that solar is guaranteed to be an environmental or economic net-negative in the northern US is misinformed at best, propaganda at worst.

Just as a single data point, my parents, who live in rural upstate NY, installed solar panels on a portion of their (connected-to-the-house) barn's roof a few years ago. Aside from times when they're literally covered in snow (which is rare, due to their temperature), they're producing power, and even in the depths of winter they produce plenty enough to offset a huge chunk of their electric bill (and in the summer, there are days and weeks at a time where they're producing more than they need).

I can't speak for the specifics of environmental impact, because I don't know the details for their panels, nor how one calculates such uneven things (how do you subtract electricity generated from the various kinds of environmental damage done to mine and refine the various rare minerals in solar panels...?), but at least economically, they're a huge win.

Re:70% of Americans Support Solar Mandate on New Homes by IXxXI on Monday February 24, 2020 @12:41AM (#22401942)
Every energy solution in existence. Whether nuclear, steam, hydroelectric, solar or coal. Was manufactured from raw materials that were mined and refined. It makes no sense for you to single out solar as if it exclusively were the only energy source this precedent relates to.
Re:70% of Americans Support Solar Mandate on New Homes by marcell on Sunday February 23, 2020 @04:32PM (#22399682)
A barn might have a lot more surface area compared to a typical home...
Re:70% of Americans Support Solar Mandate on New Homes by danaris on Sunday February 23, 2020 @06:06PM (#22400189)
The area covered by the solar panels is roughly comparable to the size of one side of a typical roof in their area—and the area is mainly middle- to lower-class.