News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by russell on Saturday February 19, 2011 @04:23PM (#2239945)
Chairs. B&N has comfy chairs where I can peruse a pile of books. Borders doesnt. But Amazon won for us. We live 40 miles from either so my GF gets everything from Amazon or other Internet sites. Even though I work not far from both, free 2 day delivery has won me over for anything other than the occasional mass market paperback.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by thematt on Saturday February 19, 2011 @05:11PM (#2240061)
free 2 day delivery has won me over

I like it too, but it's not really free. It's $79/year for an Amazon Prime membership.

Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by burgerbrain on Saturday February 19, 2011 @06:04PM (#2240190)
Unless you are a student (http://www.amazon.com/gp/student/signup/info) or a mother/father/grandparent/aunt/uncle/... (http://www.amazon.com/gp/mom/signup/info).
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by tzs on Saturday February 19, 2011 @05:55PM (#2240163)
You could use John Dvorak's trick--buy all your Amazon items through an affiliate link for an affiliate you own. If you purchase enough, your affiliate rewards will cover your Amazon Prime membership.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by ben1040 on Saturday February 19, 2011 @06:26PM (#2240258)
I tried this a long time ago -- maybe 10-12 years back, not long after they first introduced the affiliate program -- and got a friendly but pointed letter from Amazon to knock it off. Have they changed the rules?
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by jonknee on Saturday February 19, 2011 @06:41PM (#2240307)
No. It has always been against the rules.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by sk_0919 on Sunday February 20, 2011 @04:01AM (#2241468)
Any clues on how Amazon identifies this kind of behavior?
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by jonknee on Sunday February 20, 2011 @04:21AM (#2241498)
It's the same Amazon account for Associates and purchases... It's quite simple to match up. You may able to sneak around with different email and mailing addresses, but you still have cookies to deal with.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by sp332 on Saturday February 19, 2011 @05:14PM (#2240071)
Funny, my Borders has comfy chairs, a (crummy) coffee bar and wifi.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by sabat on Saturday February 19, 2011 @05:24PM (#2240096)
Yeah, all the Borders I go to have nice chairs and a decent atmosphere; the only BN that's anywhere near me doesn't have much to sit on and feels like a two-story version of a mall bookstore.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by Tyrant505 on Saturday February 19, 2011 @04:31PM (#2239961)
How far away is Walmart?
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by PostOnce on Saturday February 19, 2011 @04:49PM (#2240010)
Walmart actually has a large book section, but a small variety. Vampire romance, cooking, religion, diet, self-help, and pseudoscience relating to dietary supplements and the like. Also, a huge number of useless magazines.

Hrmm. Thinking of the impulse-buy tabloids in the checkout aisles, I wonder what would happen if they were to put a magazine of substance, a literary magazine or accessible scientific journal of some sort, amidst those tabloids. If one out of every thousand people who bought a tabloid instead opted for the better books, what would be the long-term gain of society?

If I were a dictator, I would require such experiments.

Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by tesseract on Saturday February 19, 2011 @05:24PM (#2240093)
For what it's worth, I don't subscribe to any magazines, but I'll frequently impulse-buy an Economist, Atlantic Monthly, or Scientific American at the airport, or if I find myself near a decent newsstand.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by Tyrant505 on Saturday February 19, 2011 @05:54PM (#2240161)
I asked because I wanted to gauge value of store placement. Walmart does a ton of research on where to place their stores and was just curious. People have ditched mom and pop stores for Walmart. Little book stores struggle because of selection as well.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by spc476 on Saturday February 19, 2011 @06:51PM (#2240334)
There's an independent bookstore not two miles from my house. It's been in business at least twenty years (that's as long as I've been aware of it) but they might have some advantages that other bookstores don't.

1. It caters to the nearby university by selling text books.

2. It also sells used and rare books. It's not uncommon to see books from the late 1800s/early 1900s on the shelf.

3. It's large and well lit (no chairs though; nor is there a cafe; nor is there free Wifi---it's just shelves and shelves of books).

4. It's in a city known for its wealth (Boca Raton, Fl).

I don't see it going away any time soon, but I do fear what will happen once the original owners are no longer there.

Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by quandrum on Sunday February 20, 2011 @01:08AM (#2241184)
What I really fear for this kind of store is, what percentage of their books were bought new at Borders?

If the new book supply goes away in favor of eBooks, used book stores are in a tough spot.

Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by robryan on Saturday February 19, 2011 @07:14PM (#2240394)
I think that kind of is the future of retail books, a relatively small selection of mainstream books which they can buy in bulk for cheap and they sell well.
Re:Why did Borders Tank and B&N not? by derleth on Saturday February 19, 2011 @11:23PM (#2241001)
Given the kinds of changes Wal-Mart demands of music, I wouldn't trust them to sell any of the more interesting books unaltered.

http://www.pbs.org/itvs/storewars/stores3_2.html