News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Brief History of California’s Housing Crisis by jariel on Sunday February 23, 2020 @12:25AM (#22395303)
Neither of these items are true.

As globalization increases, there is ever more increasing demand for SF/Bay real estate, it's becoming ever more elite due to the fixed nature of housing.

'All things being equal' in terms of cost, SF would be the choice 8 times out of 10 for people as a destination. SF boundaries are fixed, housing is limited, Houston is large and has room for new housing; Houston's growth is due to affordability, not because it's aspirational.

'Tourism' isn't a perfect estimation of livable aspiration, I mean, Orlando gets massive numbers of visitors each year, but SF gets a huge number of visitors as well without 'Disneyland/Epcot' to draw them in, even with a relatively small population, it's a top tourist destination in the US. [1]. Houston doesn't get a lot of tourists.

Also, Houston's population growth has slowed dramatically, with new births accounting for more than the ingress population this year.

[1] https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-visited-cities-...

With worker mobility ever increasing in this world, the demand for the 'nice spots' skyrockets.

There are no comments on this comment yet.