News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Suspicious Discontinuities by loudmax on Friday February 21, 2020 @08:16AM (#22382817)
A lot of welfare and food stamp recipients are the working poor.

This was a single mom with three children. She needs to arrange for child care while she's working and it's a good idea to set aside money for medical emergencies. I'm going to guess this job probably pays a few dollars above minimum wage.

Someone in this situation is absolutely eligible for food stamps. But if we get another four years of MAGA, then who knows, maybe not.

Re:Suspicious Discontinuities by dTal on Friday February 21, 2020 @08:48AM (#22383014)
Right, that's not the point. The point is that taking a pay cut, with apparently no other change in circumstance, somehow rendered her ineligible for a social service she was already receiving. I want to know what rule made that possible, as it appears to be critical to this discussion of perverse discontinuities.
Re:Suspicious Discontinuities by loudmax on Friday February 21, 2020 @10:07AM (#22383610)
Yeah, we're missing some details here. Could be tips or hours worked as sibling comments suggested. Life is messy.
Re:Suspicious Discontinuities by pavel_lishin on Friday February 21, 2020 @10:45AM (#22383914)
Does the food stamp program look at hourly wage as your income determinant, instead of weekly income?