News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Should Facebook, Google be liable for user posts? asks U.... by Techies4Trump on Thursday February 20, 2020 @06:12PM (#22379498)
I think if this happens, decentralized social networks will really take off.

The "small sites" you refer to , which I'm assuming are typical forum type sites, have been dying a slow death for the past few years anyway, since FB ate their lunch.

Re:Should Facebook, Google be liable for user posts? asks U.... by manfredo on Thursday February 20, 2020 @06:29PM (#22379605)
Small sites would be absolutely devastated because the threat of being held liable for user comments will be way too large of a risk. Small networks don't have the resources to pre-moderate comments or build sophisticated automated systems of identifying high risk content. How many people would host their own site when the consequences of user-submitted illegal content being posted could mean millions in liability? Very few, if any. The result is that large players are the only ones that can survive in a market where companies are held liable for user submitted content.

Maybe if by "small" you're talking about dozens of people. But I fail to see how comparably small sites like Hacker News could continue to exist without section 230 protections. It'd probably take fundamental changes like charging users a subscription in order to pay for enough moderators to pre-moderate comments and submissions and I am unsure if that's even a viable approach.