Should Facebook, Google be liable for user posts? asks U.S. Attorney General

Re:Should Facebook, Google be liable for user posts? asks U.... by AnimalMuppet on Thursday February 20, 2020 @05:10PM (#22379140)

That is not at all what my argument boils down to. My argument boils down to this: Having some anointed authority that gets to decide such things without having to follow the due process of the court system is a dangerous thing.

The point about glyphosate et al is this: Sure, those are definitely grey. But the authority could claim that they are black and white at his own discretion. If he decides against you, you then have to go to court, with the default decision being against you, in order to be able to be heard.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Should Facebook, Google be liable for user posts? asks U.... by shkkmo on Friday February 21, 2020 @11:21AM (#22384273)

I am not sure what you are talking about. What authority, other than the courts, could punish you or force you to stop talking?

Are you just saying that moderation should be illegal? In what way would going to court help you if you've been moderated off a platform?

Are you attacking some sort of straw man central censorship authority that would exist outside of the courts?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Should Facebook, Google be liable for user posts? asks U.... by AnimalMuppet on Friday February 21, 2020 @12:18PM (#22384792)

Several posts upthread, you said: "I think there are ways to regulate and pushing blatant disinformation while leaving the greyer borders up to individual discretion and discernment." So, who gets to regulate? That's your authority that is "other than the courts".

[ Parent | on HN ]