Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by manigandham on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @08:32PM
(#22371994)
Why not use a small charge against a real card? A few $1 charges work fine and are cheap enough to ignore.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by billyhoffman on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @09:05PM
(#22372149)
Until someone in QA who keeps running that test flow manually says “Wait a minute, my time is valuable!” and scripts the checkout flow in Selenium...
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by manigandham on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:45PM
(#22372520)
That's what the dev/staging environments are for. Even if you run it 3x/day in production, it's less than $100/month. Use a company card and you get the money back too.
I don't see enough of a problem that requires all the technical debt to support fake numbers in production.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by notwedtm on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:48PM
(#22372531)
This is the difference between unit and integration tests.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by OJFord on Thursday February 20, 2020 @07:25AM
(#22374546)
Manual vs selenium? No it isn't...
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by sk5t on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:52PM
(#22372544)
I've always had a concern about getting a real card flagged for fraud / card-status-probing and thus locked.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by manigandham on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:54PM
(#22372550)
I've never had it happen and it shouldn't be a problem for occasional spot checks. Make sure everything in dev/staging environments is working first before doing a production run.