Re:Assange offered pardon if he co-operated over email leak,...
by slg on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @05:17PM
(#22370696)
Ok, so I watched some of that video and there is a comically simple explanation[1] that throws a wrench into Binney's "proof". All he knows is that the files were at one point saved using a FAT filesystem. He doesn't know specifically when that happened and if it was before, during, or after the documents were stolen.
[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=593&v=mwUoE8UecC...
Re:Assange offered pardon if he co-operated over email leak,...
by ccaleb on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @05:53PM
(#22370982)
The Seth Rich thing has been widely debunked multiple times (as I said, and provided evidence for in another comment). The Fox article pushing this has been debunked. Fox is being sued by the family. There is no evidence for this theory.
Re:Assange offered pardon if he co-operated over email leak,...
by booboolayla on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @07:04PM
(#22371519)
You couldn't possibly provide any evidence because none of the evidence ever reached the public. DNC never allowed FBI to investigate the servers, so all "evidence" you have are claims originating from CrowdStrike, a private company on DNC's payroll known for lies and manipulation.
Combine that with Bill Binney's analysis that proves the data couldn't have possibly been downloaded over the internet but rather shipped on a USB: https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/becdyc/nsa_whist...