I guess the article is light on details there, but I get the impression that this is intended to be a way to send a very fast (and so hard to shoot down) missile at a target with the ability to fire multiple smaller missiles or simply to fire bullets at enemy aircraft from a vastly closer range where it's onboard sensor suite will be far more effective against enemy aircraft countermeasures.
Or simply to provide much more active countermeasures against AA sites shooting the missile down.
Something incredibly fast that uses a computer to rapidly analyze and respond to sensor data to respond with a variety of lethal options sounds terrifying and I don't especially want it to exist. But I can see the appeal of having a new missile that stands a much better chance of striking a target to make actual global adversaries think thrice.
The new cold war... yet we still have citizens without food security or health care... priorities I guess.
i.e. rocket plus some fins vs wings?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI--wFfipvA
There was another one of a rifle shooting at balloons from a drone, but I can't find the video for that.
Not quite a 'missile' but the basics seem to be relatively straightforward and within the budget of hobbyists, the DARPA program is mostly about scaling it up and dealing with the recoil and mechanical and thermal stresses associated with mobile launch platforms. Drones are severely weight constrained so getting this to a level where it is combat ready is harder than it might seem. I'm personally not sad about that, I think that any 'remote kill' capability comes with its own special set of problems and that we are very far from being ready to handle that responsibly, witness the current assassination programs.