Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets

Re:Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets by mgraczyk on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @03:30PM (#22360057)

I'm not disagreeing with your point that FB sometimes ranks content more highly when it is likely to increase engagement at the expense of your long term happiness and continued use of the site. The point I am making is that FB is well aware, doesn't want that, and devotes far more resources to fixing it than to increasing "engagement".

Also "engagement" is not the same as addiction. People who follow more close friends are more engaged on FB, but they are not addicted.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets by tripzilch on Thursday February 20, 2020 @11:36AM (#22376266)

> Also "engagement" is not the same as addiction.

Agreed, but the point is that FB's algorithm optimizing for "engagement" is in fact also optimizing for addiction[0]. And so are many others of a certain type of industry that includes YouTube, FB, Instagram, etc. It's not quite social networks, but a common factor seems to be that they're ad-funded and highly automated.

[0] and I believe it is currently way beyond our state of the art to design an algorithm that does not have this unwanted property.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets by kedean on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @06:03PM (#22361356)

> Also "engagement" is not the same as addiction. People who follow more close friends are more engaged on FB, but they are not addicted.

That's debatable. I think people who spend hours pouring through pictures from thousands of acquaintances and commenting can be considered addicted, especially when it becomes difficult to get their attention from it. I see it with people over 50 most often, I think because of an internal desire to feel connected with people who they drifted apart from years ago, or to live vicariously through others.

[ Parent | on HN ]