Re:Twitter locks WikiLeaks account days before Assange's ext...
by boomboomsubban on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @07:06AM
(#22355331)
>What I think is a shame is that you are accusing these two women of being part of a smear campaign and/or a secret conspiracy to frame Assange when there is exactly zero evidence for that theory.
Those women appear to be an unwilling part of the smear campaign, it is not a shame to call attention to this fact. The records provide ample evidence for this theory, such as their direct statements, the ordered rewrite of their complaints, and the media reporting statements the day before they were made.
Even if they have legitimate complaints against Assange, theiy are being used as part of a smear campaign.
>The two women's stories are out in the open while Assange instead opted to flee the country and has not commented on the allegations.
People that flee the country don't typically wait until they are denied a visa, and then check in with the authorities immediately before leaving the country. Assange has repeatedly opted to comment on the allegations, he just wants assurance they wouldn't send him to the US. Sweden refused to let him.
Those women appear to be an unwilling part of the smear campaign, it is not a shame to call attention to this fact. The records provide ample evidence for this theory, such as their direct statements, the ordered rewrite of their complaints, and the media reporting statements the day before they were made.
Even if they have legitimate complaints against Assange, theiy are being used as part of a smear campaign.
>The two women's stories are out in the open while Assange instead opted to flee the country and has not commented on the allegations.
People that flee the country don't typically wait until they are denied a visa, and then check in with the authorities immediately before leaving the country. Assange has repeatedly opted to comment on the allegations, he just wants assurance they wouldn't send him to the US. Sweden refused to let him.