News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX first stage landing failed for Starlink-4 launch by zanderwohl on Monday February 17, 2020 @12:13PM (#22349040)
I watched this live with a friend. We had previously watched a couple of failures, and were almost expecting that one to fail as well. We went out of our minds when the smoke cleared and the booster was upright.

It does feel annoying when rocket launches, which are enormously complex, go right and get no press, but surface in the news when they explode or fail in some way. By most standards, this launch was perfectly successful, but every time the first stages crash the press treats this like some kind of major failure.

Re:SpaceX first stage landing failed for Starlink-4 launch by scrumbledober on Monday February 17, 2020 @12:52PM (#22349262)
important to note that by any other launch provider's standards this was a perfect launch. Payload was inserted into the correct orbit, no one else even attempts to recover the booster.
Re:SpaceX first stage landing failed for Starlink-4 launch by speedgoose on Monday February 17, 2020 @12:57PM (#22349296)
However it's important to note that recovering the first stage makes sense only if it's successful enough times. Because it reduces the payload and it's more expensive as a single use.
Re:SpaceX first stage landing failed for Starlink-4 launch by gibolt on Monday February 17, 2020 @01:43PM (#22349573)
>1 is enough times for an individual booster. Some failures are ok, as long as the average is >~1.2