Re:Tesla teardown finds electronics 6 years ahead of Toyota ...
by jsight on Monday February 17, 2020 @12:09PM
(#22349018)
TBH, I think the idea that the Leaf from 7 years ago is in the same segment requires some distortion of reality. The Leaf is not nearly as sporty, had a much lower range, and also had a much less reliable battery.
The modern Leaf fixes these problems by being as expensive as a Model 3, and its still slower.
Re:Tesla teardown finds electronics 6 years ahead of Toyota ...
by perl4ever on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @06:43PM
(#22361624)
It's not in the same segment, but it's in the segment people pretend the model 3 is in - an electric car for the ordinary person.
Re:Tesla teardown finds electronics 6 years ahead of Toyota ...
by ilikehurdles on Monday February 17, 2020 @12:30PM
(#22349134)
The modern leaf is close to $10,000 cheaper than a Model 3. $31600 vs $39990.
Re:Tesla teardown finds electronics 6 years ahead of Toyota ...
by jsight on Monday February 17, 2020 @01:33PM
(#22349500)
At $31k, the Leaf does not have fast charging and has a range of 149 miles. Want "Quick" charging at a peak rate of 50KW? That's the $34k Leaf, which still has a range of 149 miles. Granted, this comes with a tax break, but comparing MSRP to MSRP, the SR Model 3 looks like the better deal at 220 miles of range.
To get to 226 miles of range with the Leaf puts you at $38k. To also get intelligent cruise (standard on the SR+ Model 3 at 40k), you will need another couple thousand dollars on the Leaf.
The tax break and dealer negotiation do make the Leaf cheaper, but the list price alone really doesn't.
This seems like a proverbial "reality distortion field" to me. The Tesla model 3 came out about 7 years after the Nissan Leaf, didn't it? And given a reasonable budget, it's arguably still not an example of a car "you can buy".
Yes, there were Teslas before the model 3, but there were also electric cars from other manufacturers for many years.