Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by ZeKK14 on Sunday February 16, 2020 @07:18PM
(#22344601)
Passenger planes make many flights per day, thus a lot of attention is made on the costs of usage (ie, the plane is not cheap to buy but it will be cheap to operate per flight).
Cargo plane fly mostly twice per day (base to sorting center and back), so they use older planes. They use more fuel per mile, but acquisition costs are low.
You can't just repurpose brand new planes for cargo use, it's not economically viable.
Plus, it would mean the safety of cargo pilots is less important than the safety of passengers...
Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by lwf on Sunday February 16, 2020 @08:09PM
(#22344795)
Sadly, at least in the US, we have lower safety standards for cargo than passenger aircraft.
For example, crew rest requirements adopted in 2010 don't apply to cargo: https://ttd.org/policy/ensure-one-level-of-safety-for-all-ai...
Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by scoot on Sunday February 16, 2020 @07:09PM
(#22344567)
> Could they convert the entire fleet into cargo jets
Because pilots' lives don't matter?
If a plane isn't safe for passengers, it isn't safe for the crew.
Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by edoceo on Sunday February 16, 2020 @07:37PM
(#22344678)
Elon puts bots on the plane. Then it's only hardware flying around. Just don't crash onto living things.
Could they convert the entire fleet into cargo jets, or does the configuration not match that role?