News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by taberiand on Sunday February 16, 2020 @06:37PM (#22344424)
This kind of coincidence is just cute, it doesn't imply anything useful mathematically right?
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by dwaltrip on Sunday February 16, 2020 @09:27PM (#22345102)
The fun thing about math (and science and technology as well) is that it is you can't always tell what is going to useful down the road.

"Interestingness" is often as good a heuristic as any when looking for paths that lead to useful developments, although the path is often not a straight one or short one.

I also like the idea of secondary and tertiary effects. One simple example: By "playing" with cute yet fun ideas that are highly likely to not lead to anything immediately interesting, we can build up skillsets and capabilities that lead to very useful results for other problems. Perhaps this is somewhat akin to how the young of predator species "play" around in a way that prepares them to actually hunt when they are older.

Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by Cpoll on Monday February 17, 2020 @10:46AM (#22348465)
Have any developments come out of adding the digits? My impulse is to dismiss it out of hand because it only works in base-10, which in my mind leans it towards numerology instead of math.
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by dwaltrip on Monday February 17, 2020 @06:04PM (#22351776)
It looks like there are some applications. Checksum algorithms are probably the easiest to appreciate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit_sum#Applications

Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by mafaa on Monday February 17, 2020 @07:57PM (#22352478)
I think small random uses add up to practical value although there are those who make a religion out of its 'meaning'.

some (n mod 9) can be found by (is congruent to) (sum of the digits mod 9) instead is the most obvious example

True only in base 10 although similar congruences exist for other bases and also involve adding the digits

Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by nitrogen on Sunday February 16, 2020 @11:31PM (#22345619)
I'm terrible at discrete math so I'm not going to work it out, but I'm sure it would be possible to express that relationship in a way that it could adapt to other number bases, and then it might be easier to tell if there is something there.

(something like treating the digits as coefficients of a series of powers of the number base, defining a function f(b,n) that returns the sum of the digits of n in base b, setting that equal to the product of the forward and reverse representation of that result in base b, and seeing if the equation looks interesting)

E.g. you can use a similar technique to show why the finger counting method of multiplying by 9 works, or why multiples of 3 have digits that sum to a multiple of 3 (same for 9)

Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by BGthaOG on Sunday February 16, 2020 @07:53PM (#22344733)
I would not be surprised if it is found to be useful. My reason for this is the Quran's mathematical composition, founded on the number 19: https://www.masjidtucson.org/quran/miracle/
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by lonelappde on Sunday February 16, 2020 @08:22PM (#22344836)
That's numerological nonsense like Bible Code.
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by BGthaOG on Monday February 17, 2020 @11:04AM (#22348596)
It is not; I invite you to study it before you reject it.
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by mangamadaiyan on Monday February 17, 2020 @09:37PM (#22352977)
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. Pray supply something more substantial than a link (to what looks like a religious organisation) in support of your claim.
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by BGthaOG on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @12:25PM (#22367682)
I agree, hence the link. You are asking me to write out in a comment the information that is presented clearly and accessibly in the link.
Re:Ramanujan Surprises Again (2015) by mangamadaiyan on Thursday February 20, 2020 @11:48AM (#22376371)
Took a quick look. All that it seems to say is a version of "19, therefore {deity}didit". Not clear, smells like numerological nonsense, so no thank you, moving on.