Re:Microsoft cut off game maker's revenue stream, so he buil...
by DarknessFalls on Saturday February 15, 2020 @11:19PM
(#22339763)
Television has been paying for programming through ads for decades now. Do you think that's not a 'real' business model? A good business model is one that makes someone 7 figures a year for cloning solitaire. It might not be the most enjoyable gaming experience, but if purity of solitaire is what you want, then there are plenty of paid alternatives.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft cut off game maker's revenue stream, so he buil...
by crooked-v on Sunday February 16, 2020 @12:26AM
(#22339937)
A massive difference here is that TV ads don't come with ubiquitous invasions of privacy every time you see them, nor do they have a small but constant risk of malware infecting your TV.
Re:Microsoft cut off game maker's revenue stream, so he buil...
by DanBC on Sunday February 16, 2020 @08:49AM
(#22341514)
But as tv moves away from broadcast signals to VOD services that's going to change. See for an early example 4OD in the UK: https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/04/28/behind-all-4s-new-pe...
> Channel 4 earlier this week unveiled a new video on demand advertising package allowing brands to directly address viewers - in practise this meant first adopters 20th Century Fox, Foster' and Ronseal, could grab the attention of by literally calling out their names in their creative.
Re:Microsoft cut off game maker's revenue stream, so he buil...
by dwild on Monday February 17, 2020 @10:33AM
(#22348365)
> nor do they have a small but constant risk of malware infecting your TV.
The same goes for anything that you install / access on your devices, yet we aren't talking about removing theses capacities and I sure hope so that you won't argue that.
Re:Microsoft cut off game maker's revenue stream, so he buil...
by ta999999171 on Sunday February 16, 2020 @01:49AM
(#22340216)
Not familiar with Smart TVs then, eh?