Re:Facebook reverses on paid influencers after Bloomberg memes
by mc32 on Friday February 14, 2020 @02:54PM
(#22329735)
I don’t see a clear difference between Swift/WSJ telling you something and your FB feed telling you something. I think Gervais had some truth to what he was saying. Famous people have much more gravitas than they deserve (given any expertise on any particular subject they feel is worthy of advancing). I hope you appreciate the irony in this quip.
Re:Facebook reverses on paid influencers after Bloomberg memes
by icebraining on Saturday February 15, 2020 @04:22AM
(#22334201)
I think ajross is OK with Facebook telling you, just on their blog or something, not on ads.
The problem with paid advertising is that this breaks down. Now it's not the "people" we trust that are telling us this stuff, it's the "places" we go to find those people. There's a difference between Zukerberg telling us who to vote for and Facebook taking money to plaster our feed with Bloomberg ads. So people who are likely to "trust" their Facebook feed (which is most people) are now at the mercy of whoever is willing to pay Facebook the most money.