Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex...
by theseadroid on Friday February 14, 2020 @11:35AM
(#22327899)
I wonder if we shall take exposure density into consideration? If RF is emitted in all directions, the closer the phone to the body, the same amount of RF will be received by a smaller area of skin?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex...
by oefrha on Friday February 14, 2020 @11:39AM
(#22327938)
You’re still thinking about a point source, where the actual scenario is closer to two parallel plates, in which case the non-normal components cancel out, leaving only the normal component, except at the edges.
The most basic example from electrostatics: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elesht.h...
Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex...
by cdelsolar on Friday February 14, 2020 @11:44AM
(#22327977)
I don't think the phone emits radiation from its entire body
Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex...
by RL_Quine on Friday February 14, 2020 @11:55AM
(#22328064)
That's what the cuts around the metal band of the iPhone are for, to segment the edge into different tuned antennas.
Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex...
by klodolph on Friday February 14, 2020 @12:25PM
(#22328294)
If you try to make an antenna too small compared to wavelength, it will become less efficient and more difficult to design. 900 MHz is the 33 cm band, so if you have a more standard size antenna on the order of quarter-wavelength size, you get an antenna that’s about 8cm.