Re:The specification for native image lazy-loading is merged...
by pedrocr on Thursday February 13, 2020 @04:15AM
(#22316366)
All the examples are indeed over 2.6Mb as that's only 325kB. You probably mean 2.6MB instead but since you're using Mb consistently and the discussion is about transfer sizes I'm not sure.
Re:The specification for native image lazy-loading is merged...
by pedrocr on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:37AM
(#22317228)
If you felt mistreated I'm sorry. But it was a genuine question.
However, this is good, because those are great examples of how browser lazy loading is going to help. When I loaded Reddit it pulled down 7Mb of data, but more than 5Mb was images. Looking at the content above the fold my browser downloaded about 4.5Mb that it doesn't need until I scroll. This change to the HTML spec will get all those sites first load below the average size of a Kindle book. Awesome.