No, people stopped writing logging frameworks years ago. Even Log4Perl and Log::Dispatch interoperate now. The cool new thing is web frameworks. But of course, due to PSGI, those all work together too! "There's more than one way to do it", but at least you can deploy them all to production in the same way.
As for bugs; trust me, people reply to them. Take a look at how many Moose bugs are "resolved", for example: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Status=Resolved.... That's a lot more than "never".
Stopped? Years ago? Log::Fine (2008), Amphibic::Log (2010), Su::Log (2011), Easy::Log (2007), Log::Smart (2007), Log::Deep (2009), Util::Thread::Logger (2011), ...
I won't even mention all the one-module-specific mini-logging scripts which do it yet another way.
Who cares? So one guy posts his code to the Internet for people to look at, and there are a lot of one guys. What's the solution to this "problem"?
True regarding duplication - if I had a penny for every new incomplete logging framework uploaded to CPAN, I'd be a rich man...